A couple of articles out of New Zealand a while back caught my attention. They have as their focus Hugh McCutcheon. He’s a Kiwi who coached the USA national team in two Olympics and now leads the University of Minnesota program. One article relates to Hugh helping out the NZ federation in a push to develop more female volleyball coaches.* Apparently, there was a growth surge in girls playing volleyball in the island nation, which was certainly good to hear. If nothing else, that would help develop more female coaches. It will likely take at least a generation to have a meaningful influence, though. Given the trials and tribulations of trying to encourage and sustain women in volleyball coaching in the US and elsewhere, it might be interesting to follow how things go.

Of perhaps more interest from a coaching perspective, however, is the other article which focuses on team culture. In it Hugh talks about making a series of changes to how things operated at Minnesota. Some were akin to ones we brought in during my time at Exeter. To be honest, a couple of them surprised me. Not that the change was made, but that they weren’t in place already.

As the article notes, making changes at that level is likely to cause some issues. In this case it saw several players decide they no longer wanted to be part of the team. From Hugh’s perspective that was fine because it essentially saw those who would likely not go along with what he was trying to do self-select themselves out. The challenge, however, can be dealing with external expectations while going through the likely rough patch while implementing changes.

The article actually got me thinking about the sort of things I might have to do in taking over a new program as a head coach – or working as an assistant with a new head coach.

Have you ever had to put through a cultural change? If so, what was it and how did you go about doing so?

* There’s some inflation with respect to a couple of stats in the article. The U.S. doesn’t have 15,000 volleyball scholarship athletes – at least not ones on full or near full scholarships.

There are about 1700 women’s collegiate volleyball programs. Division III teams account for nearly 540 of them. There are no athletic scholarships at that level. NCAA Division I teams can have no more than 12 players on scholarship. Usually, that means full scholarships go to 12 players. NCAA Division II programs are allowed 8 full scholarships, which they generally split up. If the NJCAA Division I and II follow the same rules, and NAIA and the remainder of the 2-year schools also have 12 scholarships, it adds up to about 12,700 total full scholarships available at the very maximum.

Many schools, though, don’t offer the full number of scholarships. This is especially true outside NCAA Division I. I suspect in reality the number of full scholarships available is below 10,000. That said, many of them are split up to provide multiple partial scholarships.

The idea that sand volleyball will get to 10,000 scholarship athletes any time soon is massively optimistic. Keep in mind that only 10 players compete for a school’s team in any given event. You’d need all 10 on scholarship at 1000 schools, not counting ones on indoor scholarships, to hit 10k.

6 Steps to Better Practices - Free Guide

Join my mailing list today and get this free guide to making your practices the best, along with loads more coaching tips and information.

No spam ever. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit

John Forman
John Forman

John is currently the Men's & Women's Head Volleyball Coach at Medaille College, as well as Global Director for Volleyball for Nation Academy (formerly Charleston Academy). His previous experience includes the college and university level in the US and UK, professional coaching in Sweden, and both coaching and club management at the Juniors level. Learn more on his bio page.

    1 Response to "Making a cultural change"

    • Matt Smith

      “To do so he made four behaviours compulsory: being on time, going to study hall, not wearing jewellery to practise and everyone wearing the same team colours to training.”

      The compulsory behaviors were in place prior to his hire. Hugh threw those out the door upon his arrival. The team functioned okay for a year and then it ran-a-muck internally; he re- instituted a few of the compulsory behaviors and now elevates himself as a change agent. It is an interesting trend of his. Not a fan.

Please share your own ideas and opinions.