When do we coach for performance vs for development?

Here’s a question.

At what level or levels – or perhaps situation(s) – do we prioritize coaching for performance (meaning winning) as opposed to mainly prioritizing player development?

Notice that I used “prioritize” in there. That was very intentional. We are just about always doing both to some degree or another.

What I’m after is people’s thoughts of when the main focus for a season is (or should be) on winning as opposed to progressing players’ skills, volleyball IQ, etc.

Here’s an example. In my opinion, junior varsity teams should be about development. They exist quite explicitly to feed players into the varsity team. Thus, winning takes a back seat.

Let me know your thoughts in the comment area below.

6 Steps to Better Practices - Free Guide

Subscribe to my weekly newsletter today and get this free guide to making your practices the best, along with loads more coaching tips and information.

No spam ever. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by Kit

John Forman

John is currently the Strategic Manager for Talent (oversees the national teams) and Indoor Performance Director for Volleyball England. His 20+ years of volleyball coaching experience includes all three NCAA divisions, plus Junior College, in the US; university and club teams in the UK; professional coaching in Sweden; and both coaching and club management at the Juniors level. He's also been a visiting coach at national team, professional club, and juniors programs in several countries.

Please share your own ideas and opinions.

Latest Posts