Tag Archive for volleyball trials

Decisions in the try-out process

Life is definitely not easy for me this week. As I have been documenting (see this and this post), the university teams I coach are going through try-outs now. Most of the work of player identification took place on Friday. This week is more about refining player analysis and starting to fit together line-ups. That stuff can be tricky enough when you have to worry about fielding a single team out of a group of players. Imagine if you had to field two teams out of that same group.

That is my current situation. This season we will field men’s and women’s teams in both the Premier League and Western Division 2A of BUCS. We did the same thing last season (though it was Division 1 rather than the Premier League), basically using a split squad system whereby everyone trained together, with the first team players taking the higher league matches and the second team players the lower league.

This year we will do the same again for the men. Not much choice in the matter as the club simply doesn’t have enough male players to run two full separate competitive teams. Numbers are definitely not a problem on the women’s side. The issue there is where the talent split falls. Are there enough players of comparable level to make a 10-12 person first team? If so, running two separate teams in possible. Otherwise, like with the men, it will have to be a joint group as it was last year.

And of course running these joint groups creates its own set of challenges. How do you develop trainings that bring the weaker players along while also pushing the stronger players the way they need to be pushed?

These are the things very much on my mind at the moment.

Team Try-Outs Part Deux

In yesterday’s post I told the harrowing tale of expecting 20-something women to try-out for the university women’s team I coach and ending up with 40-something. After making many, many cuts, we got down to 17 players to invite back, along with 15 on the men’s side.

These were not expected to be the final rosters, however. It was anticipated that additional players would turn up this week – players who hadn’t arrived to campus yet (classes started on Monday), didn’t hear about Friday’s trial, had a conflict, etc. That meant I had to plan Monday’s sessions in much the same manner I did for Friday’s in terms of being flexible enough to account for an uncertain number of players – potentially something into the 20s.

One big constraint for Monday was court space. These sessions were in our primary training facility, which has just one court and very little room around it. Basically, everything happens in the space of the court itself. Fortunately, we were up to 90 minutes for each group.

For the women especially, Friday’s try-out was mainly about seeing who wasn’t up to the standard because of the massive numbers. Having been able to cull that list, Monday was now about getting a good look at what we really have and starting to think in terms of team composition. Yes, some more new faces might have needed to be evaluated, but it would be a minority part of the group, and as such it wouldn’t force a different approach.

Key areas of focus

It will come as no surprise that the two biggest areas I wanted to focus on to have a serious evaluation were setter and middle hitter. I haven’t seen too many situations where identifying OHs and OPPs, along with a libero, is a major challenge.

In the men’s case we have two guys back who set last year. In an ideal world we’d probably want a new setter coming in, but we could get along without one. Only one of our primary MBs from last year returns, maybe with one other, so that is really an area in need of new bodies. In the women’s case we lost all of our setters and primary middle players from last year. We have one returner who could set and one who could play MB, but we’re probably best if they didn’t have to.

The Plan

So with those priorities in mind – and given the requirement to be flexible in terms of the number of players to be accommodated – here’s what I came up with. Start with dynamic warm-up, then move on to pepper. If the numbers allow, do rotating partner pepper to get the players mixed up working together. Then do serving & passing, with setters in setting the ball to 4. From there, on to hitting by position. Finish up with some version of winners, depending on numbers.

The Reality

Shock of shocks, I didn’t have to deal with an excess of players. In fact, both teams were missing a couple of bodies from those called back, though there was 1 new male player. That let me basically run things to plan. With the men’s team I didn’t include setters in the passing drill because I pretty much know who they are, but instead shifted to a targeted good pass number (30), with a -1 for an overpass and back to 0 on a no-effort ball (they had to restart once). For winners I had the women play 4s because of the higher numbers (15), and the men play 3s on a narrow court.

Another session tonight and tomorrow for the women, tomorrow and Thursday for the men. I will need to make further cuts, at least on the women’s side.

And then it all went sideways!

The other day I mentioned a challenge I had in running a pair of tryouts for the university teams I coach. Specifically, I had to plan something despite not knowing how many players I would have, or how many helpers. I had only an hour allocated for each gender, inclusive of introduction and warm-up (and any lingering registration stuff). So basically, I had to come up with a flexible warm-up activity that could account for players trickling in from getting registered, and then about 40 minutes worth of primary drills/games.

A real coach’s dream situation, eh?

I basically took a end-to-beginning approach in my planning. I wanted to end with some kind of play. Given my expectation of large numbers and the small amount of time, 6 v 6 was out. I needed something that could reasonably accommodate player counts in the 20s on a single court. I decided to go with two half-court Speedball games going side-by-side. Depending on the numbers, I could have both mini courts be doubles, both be triples, or one for each.

The other main thing I wanted to be able to see was serving and passing – especially while I had access to the bigger sports hall. For that I picked the 2-sided serving & passing drill. It’s one that allows for some flexibility in numbers involved. That said, however, you probably don’t want to use more than about 14 players in the drill (6 passers, 2 targets, 6 servers), so I needed to have something on the side for excess players and to thereby have a rotation through the drill. That would have to be something like a pepper or defensive drill which could be done without the net in a fairly confined area. I decided that if I had helpers of a reasonable caliber I would have a defense station, but otherwise go with group pepper.

Now, if I’m going to have players serve – and then later hit – I need to make sure their shoulders are sufficiently warmed-up. To accomplish that, I decided to split the group in half. One would do a partner serving warm-up on the net, the other would do partner pepper off the court. After a certain amount of time (probably 5 minutes max) I would have them flip.

That leaves the initial warm-up. My plan was to have the returners lead the group in dynamic warm-up after the introduction. By that point we should have most people, if not all, through the registration process and ready to go. Plus, it would give me a chance to see who takes it seriously and who just goes through the motions.

That was the basic plan going in. Here’s the reality.

The women
I ended up with what must have been close to 50 women’s trialists!

That mandated a rapid change of approach. We had to make on-the-fly cuts, which I wouldn’t otherwise do. Fortunately, we had more gym space than we’d though, so rather than saying to a player “Sorry, you’re out” we could simply move them over to the other side of the curtain where they could continue working with some of the helpers who were on-hand. Yes, those players probably figured out pretty quickly what the situation was, but it was a bit more gentle than having to just ask them to leave the gym outright.

Four-person pepper was run after doing a dynamic warm-up. That was when we started culling the more obvious No’s. I then had them doing some serving – kind of like a pre-match warm-up thing. Definitely not idea given the numbers we still had, but it was an easy way to identify more players just not up to the required standard.

Luckily, having the extra gym space availed us of a second court. Because of a curtain situation it wasn’t full-sized, but we managed. I split the group in half and sent one set of players over there to hit, keeping the other to do serving and passing, swapping the groups at a certain point. We were able to get down to 27 players left in the mix for the last 20 minutes, during which I had them play Speedball, more or less as outlined above.

The men
Things were much more reasonable for the men. We only had 20 of them to manage, which was just a little more than we had last season.

Because they had largely been peppering and stuff on the other side of the curtain before getting going, after doing a dynamic warm-up I had them go straight into doing some serving. As with the women, I also had them doing serving and passing, and finished with Speedball. Because I had a bit of extra time, though, I also had them run through hitting lines going through 4 and 2.

Outcomes
I met with the leadership after the men’s try-out to discuss who would be invited back for this week’s try-out continuation. On the women’s side we cut the list from that 27 still involved at the end down to 17. On the men’s side we ended up with 15.

Moving forward
This week we have sessions on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. They are a combination of a continuation of the try-outs and the start of training for this year’s teams. The anticipation is that we might see a handful of additional players turn up who either didn’t know about last week’s trial, weren’t on campus yet (school starts today), had a conflict, or whatever. As a result, we may yet end up cutting some of the players who survived Friday’s culling.

I am personally looking forward to being able to really take a close look at the new players this week. Especially with the women, it was almost impossible to do on Friday. As I told someone that evening, I was so focused on who we should cut that I didn’t have the opportunity to really look at the Yes and Maybe players to see what they had to offer. Now I can do that and start to think in terms of team composition.

It’s trial day!

This is a story from back when I coached the teams at the University of Exeter (U.K.).

I have to run two try-out sessions this afternoon for the university teams I coach. The first is for the women. The second is for the men. Each will be an hour in length. We were supposed to have 3 hours, but somehow had the last hour we requested lopped off. We only found out yesterday! I will be the only coach there, though I should have a bit of support from returning players. At least I will for the women’s session, anyway.

How many prospective players will turn up is a big question mark. Last year we had about 24 women and 18 men on the first day of the 3-day trials. On the men’s side we took things a bit slow. We did not feel rushed to make any immediate cuts, but we wanted to try to trim the numbers for the women right away in the case of the obvious No’s. We cut about half a dozen after that first session, but ended up with something like 26 players for the second one!

No surprise if something similar happens this year. Yesterday was the last of the club’s “taster” sessions. They use them to introduce themselves prospective new members. There were about 80 of them, mostly female.That’s been the clear pattern in my time at Exeter.

I was on-hand for the taster (the third and final held during Freshers’ Week) to scout out prospective BUCS players and to advise the club leadership on ways to run the session more smoothly (different drills and games they could employ). We don’t normally see a lot in the way of likely BUCS contenders at the tasters, as mainly the experienced ones go straight to try-outs, but sometimes one or two will turn up worth having a look at. Ended up being a few more than that this year – particularly for the women.

Today’s the real test, though. This is when we find out if the rumors about this player or that player which always seem to be flying around are actually true.

The situation is this. The women return only three from last year’s BUCS semifinalists, while the men have back four of the guys who featured in their victory over Durham in the 7th place playoff at Final 8s, plus a few of the second team members. I saw a few women during the tasters who could probably be in the team, potentially even as starters. Wasn’t quite so dazzled by the men, but maybe a couple of squad players.

Adding complexity to all this is the fact that we have to consider things from the perspective of two teams for each gender. The club runs teams in the new BUCS Premier League (teams promoted up from Division 1) and in Division 2. Last year we just trained them all together as one unit and had the second string group play the Div2 matches. Don’t know yet if we’ll do the same this year. The gap between Premier League and Div2 will be markedly bigger than the one between Div1 and Div2.

Fortunately, we don’t have to make final decisions today. We have sessions the first half of next week as well to be able to take a longer look.