Your mandate and situation influences your coaching approach
Baseball manager Ned Yost was criticized for not being analytics-driven. His mandate, however, was developmental, now win now. Priorities make a difference.
@media only screen and (max-width: 767px) and (min-width: 300px){ .navbar-brand h1{ font-size: 30px !important; line-height: 40px !important; } }
Baseball manager Ned Yost was criticized for not being analytics-driven. His mandate, however, was developmental, now win now. Priorities make a difference.
How do you prioritize the time and effort that goes into coaching your team? Here are some thoughts on that subject from a fellow blogger.
A few ideas for improving volleyball were offered up recently. I'm not sure I agree with the first one, but go along with the idea of better production.
We suffered our second loss in a very tight match against Danish opposition. It helped highlight some developmental needs in defense and transition.
Does your eagerness to get on to playing the next match depend on your last result? Do you want to keep playing after a win, but train more after a loss?
When I coached in Sweden a reporter once gave our opposition some locker room material by suggesting that we expected to win our match 3-0 or 3-1. Ugh!
Guest players at training was a fairly regular occurrence when I coached in Sweden. There are different types, though, each with their own considerations.
Once, back in my Sweden coaching days, a reporter asked me if I was getting a sense of deja vu as our match unfolded. I honestly told him I wasn't.
A week working on some new offensive options paid some match benefits, but with some other developments.